Business Valuation
by Michael Hoffman

What is a Business Valuation?

A business valuation determines the estimated market value of a business entity. A valuation estimates the complex economic benefits that arise from combining a group of physical assets with a group of intangible assets of the business as a going concern. The valuation, which is part art and part science, estimates the price that hypothetical informed buyers and sellers would negotiate at arms length for an entire business or a partial equity interest.

Valuation vs. Appraisal: How Do They Differ?

Valuation and appraisals are similar, but they are not interchangeable. Most people are familiar with appraisals in their personal lives. Often times people will have appraisals performed on a house, a car or a piece of jewelry. The key difference between a valuation and an appraisal is that a valuation includes both tangible and intangible assets, while an appraisal just includes tangible or physical assets.

Business Valuation: Art or Science?

A business valuation combines quantitative financial techniques with qualitative analysis of the business, the industry and the economic conditions in general.

Why Do a Valuation?

Lack of an Efficient Market
Despite the commonly held belief that markets are efficient, an efficient market does not exist for privately held businesses and certain fractional equity interests. Unlike the NYSE or the NASDAQ there is no place to buy and sell privately held businesses aside from the business brokerage community, which is small in scope. As a result, it is very difficult to determine what a privately held business is worth in the marketplace. This lack of an efficient market presents a critical need for valuation services.

Exit Strategy
The business owner needs to develop a strategy to enable him or her to obtain value from the company when he or she decides to sell. If a potential buyer is able to invest fewer dollars on his or her own and duplicate the seller's business the potential buyer would obviously be better off starting a new business than buying an existing one.

Business Valuations are Usually Performed for Five Primary Reasons

  1. To establish a price for a transaction
  2. Business planning
  3. Attract capital
  4. Aid in estate and gift planning
  5. Meet governmental requirements

Establishing a Price for a Transaction
Valuations help business owners in the sale of a business by determining a reasonable asking price. A valuation can also be used in a merger/acquisition transaction as a due diligence consideration.

Business Planning
Often times a valuation can help business owners negotiate buy/sell agreements. A sound valuation can become part of the actual buy/sell agreement. A valuation that is prepared prior to the occurrence of a liquidation event can save both time and money.

Business owners can also use a business valuation as one of the cornerstones of a long-term financial plan to enhance the value of their business. Business owners often use management consulting to improve strategies and tactics through a particular function (e.g., marketing, operations.) Business valuation consulting focuses on how strategies and tactics create value for business owners.

Attract Capital
Valuations are often an important part of obtaining debt or equity financing.

Estate and Gift Planning
If an interest in a closely held company is material to a person's net worth a valuation of that investment should be an integral part of the person's estate planning. When a person dies a posthumous valuation of a closely held business is often done as part of the estate's tax return. These valuations are important because the IRS audits most estate tax returns even if the value of the closely held business is of modest value.

Also, if an owner of a closely held business wants to make a charitable gift of a business interest the IRS requires a valuation.

Governmental Requirements
The IRS requires a valuation for employee stock ownership plans (ESOP's) and in conjunction with the conversion of a C corporation to an S corporation. Many states also require valuations in divorce proceedings or minority shareholder actions.

The Components of a Business Valuation

IRS Revenue Ruling 59-60 states that valuations should address the following issues:

  • The nature and history of the business
  • The general economic outlook and the conditions of the specific industry
  • The book value of the stock
  • The financial condition of the company
  • The earnings capacity of the company
  • The dividend paying capacity of the company
  • Whether the company has goodwill or other intangible value
  • Previous sales of stock
  • The market price of publicly traded companies who are engaged in the same or similar lines of business

Historical Performance
The past and future earnings power of a business is often the single most significant factor in the valuation of a business. The quality and completeness of the company's accounting and financial records also have a significant impact on the valuation. An incomplete set of financial records will cause the valuator to have to make significant "normalized" adjustments to reflect the true financial position of the company.

Company Management
The quality and depth of management is obviously a critical factor in the value of a business.

Company Ownership
The size of the ownership interest being valued has a significant impact on the valuation. A minority interest in a business might have to be adjusted for a lack of control discount, while a controlling interest may be given a premium for having control.

Conditions of Operations
The physical aspects of a business are important as well. A company with current systems and new equipment will have a higher value than a company that has deferred investment in infrastructure and equipment for several years.

Proprietary Products and Services
Proprietary products, services or processes add significant value to a business. These legal rights can insulate a company from its competition and allow it to charge higher prices in the market.

Industry
The macroeconomic condition of the company's industry is also an important consideration in a business valuation. A company in a high growth industry will have a higher value than a company in a mature industry.

Competition
As all business owners know, the company's position in the competitive marketplace has a significant impact on the overall financial performance of the business. Valuators put a great deal of stock in market share and on the basis in which the company competes in the markets that it operates in.

Government Regulation
As laws change so do their effects on businesses. Unfortunately many laws and regulations are designed for Fortune 1,000 companies. As an example, General Electric may be able to easily comply with certain environmental laws, but these same laws may be a significant burden to a small business. The valuation must consider these regulatory roadblocks.

How is a Business Valuation Conducted?

The business valuation process can be broken down into four components.

  1. Engagement process
  2. Research and data gathering
  3. Analysis and estimate of value
  4. Reporting Engagement Process

There are several issues that must be addressed at the start of the business valuation process.

  • Definition of the legal interest to be valued - (e.g., 100% of the company's common stock)
  • Valuation date - the date of the estimate of value
  • Purpose of the valuation (e.g., estate tax, sale of a business, business planning, etc.)
  • Define standard of value: Fair market value - the value in an exchange between a willing buyer and a willing seller with a reasonable understanding of the facts. Fair market value is the most common standard of value and the IRS requires it; Investment value - the value to a particular investor based on individual investment requirements. This standard is often used in merger transactions.
  • Define the premise of value: Value as a going concern - this is the value of a business assuming it will continue to operate as a going concern; Liquidation value - this is the value of a business that is not operating as a going concern, but has commenced an orderly disposition of its assets.
  • Form and content of the report

Research and Data Gathering
At this point the valuator will request certain information from the client. This request may include the following.

  • Financial statements
  • Tax returns
  • Accounts receivable, accounts payable and inventory detail
  • Contracts/leases
  • Budgets/forecasts
  • Board of directors minutes
  • Organization chart
  • Marketing material/price lists

While this information is being gathered the valuator will be performing industry and comparable company research.

Analysis and Estimate of Value
During this phase the valuator puts together and analyzes all of the internal company information in conjunction with the industry and comparable company research. This analysis will then enable the valuator to synthesize an estimate of value.

Reporting
In the reporting phase the valuator will issue his or her report. There are three basic types of reports.

  • Oral report - issued when time does not permit a written report to be issued
  • Limited scope report - provides a well-documented estimate of value that can be used for many purposes, while taking into consideration the cost of the report preparation.
  • Full scope report - the most detailed and costly estimate of value. This type of report is often used for litigation purposes.

At the end of the valuation process the valuator will ask the client to sign a client representation letter that states, in effect, that everything that the client supplied to the valuator is true and accurate to the best of the client's knowledge and abilities.

Role of the Valuator

Unlike legal counsel who is ethically obligated to be the client's advocate, the valuator is independent. In the past valuators were often hired by legal counsel to support a particular preconceived position. Although this practice still exists it occurs less frequently today. In the long run, the advocacy bias creates tension between parties trying to reach a good faith agreement on the value of a business. Even if the valuator has to provide expert testimony in a court proceeding the valuator's ultimate responsibility is to document and support his or her estimate of value. The IRS, AICPA, SEC and the DOL all have various rules regarding independence and the advocacy position of the valuator.

As a general rule our firm will not accept a valuation engagement, in which the valuation report will be used by a third party, or for a client for whom we do audit or tax work.

Role of the Client

The key to a successful valuation is establishing a relationship of mutual trust among the valuator, the client and the client's professional advisors. It is in the client's best interest to be open and forthcoming with the valuator in order to avoid errors and reduce costs.

What a Valuation is not

A valuation is not an audit or review. The valuator is not providing any form of assurance, as defined by the AICPA, on his or her estimate of value. The valuation is also not a strategic plan or a long-term financial forecast.

What Affects the Price of a Valuation

The three biggest factors that affect the price of a valuation are the type of report to be issued, the availability, completeness and organization of the company's financial records and the purpose of the valuation. As an example, a valuation prepared for estate planning purposes with a limited scope report will cost significantly less than a valuation prepared for a high net worth divorce case that requires a full scope report and expert testimony in a court proceeding.

How to Reduce the Price of a Valuation

There are four key steps that a client can take to reduce the cost of the valuation engagement. The two most important steps for the client are to be open and honest with the valuator during the engagement and to keep detailed and organized financial records. Clients should also consider having valuations done on a periodic basis. This will significantly reduce the time spent by the valuator in the research and data gathering phase. Finally, like any other significant purchase, the client should do comparative shopping and get at least two or three quotes for the assignment.


 

Business Valuation

Business valuation is a mix of art and science. The bottom line is, of course, that a business is worth what a buyer will pay for it. However, there are ways of estimating a fair price. Several of those methods are described in this section. There are variations of these and there are other methods that apply to specific situations. It is not uncommon to value a business by a number of different methods and use an average (or more likely a weighted average that gives more weight to some methods than to others) of the various methods used.

Note that there are a number of reasons for valuing a business, other than buying or selling it. Businesses are valued for estate and tax purposes, divorce settlements, and for raising capital. In keeping with the purpose of this web site, all valuation discussion here will be limited to valuing for buying and selling.

Need help valuing your company? We offer business valuations for a very reasonable price. Click here for more information on our valuation services.

 

Table of Contents:

  1. Capitalized Earning Approach
  2. Excess Earning Method
  3. Cash Flow Method
  4. Tangible Assets (Balance Sheet) Method
  5. Cost to Create Approach (Leapfrog Start Up)
  6. Rule of Thumb Methods
  7. EBITDA Method
  8. Valuation based on Synergies
  9. Business Valuation by M&S

 

1. Capitalized Earning Approach

 

A common method of valuing a business is called the Capitalization of Earnings (or Capitalized Earnings) method. Capitalization refers to the return on investment that is expected by an investor. The logic is readily understandable to any business person-- it's as simple as evaluating return on investment based on the risk involved. As simple as it is, it provides a good understanding of how a buyer may initially approach valuaing your business.

To demonstrate the capitalization method of valuation, let's look at a mythical and highly oversimplified business. Pretend the business is simply a post office box to which people send money. The magic post office box has been collecting money at the rate of about $10,100 per year steadily for ten years with very little variation. It is likely to continue to collect money at this rate indefinitely. The only expense for this business is $100 per year rent charged by the post office. So the business earns $10,000 per year ($10,100-$100). Because the PO box will continue to collect money indefinitely at the same rate, it retains its full value. The buyer should be able to sell it at any time and get his initial investment back.

A buyer would look at this "minimum risk" business earning $10,000 and compare it to other ways of investing his or her money to earn $10,000 per year. Let's assume a near no risk investment like a savings account or government treasury bills currently pays about 4% a year. At the 4% rate, for someone to earn the same $10,000 per year that the magic PO box earns, an investment of $250,000 (250,000 times 4%= $10,000) would be required. Therefore, the PO box value is in the area of $250,000. It is an equivalent investment in terms of risk and return to the savings account or T-bill.

Now the real world of business has no magic PO boxes and no "no risk" situations. Business owners take risks and have expenses, and business equipment can and usually does depreciate in value. The higher the perceived risk, the higher the capitalization rate (percentage) that the buyer will use to estimate value. Rates of 20% to 25% are common for small business capitalization calculations. That is, buyers will look for a return on their investment of 20% to 25% in buying a small business. However, as we'll see below, some businesses have value to some buyers for reasons that have little to do with the amount of money they are earning.

 

2. Excess Earning Method

 

This method is similar to the capitalization method described above. The difference is that it splits off return on assets from other earning (the excess earnings). For example, let's suppose Mr. Owner runs a business that manufactures novelty products. His company has Tangible Assets of $900,000. Further let's suppose that Mr. Owner pays himself a very reasonable market value salary-- the same amount that he would have to pay a competent manager to do his job. After paying the salary Mr. Owner's business has earnings of $360,000.

The financially rational reason for owning business assets is to produce a financial return. Let's say that a reasonable return on Mr. Owner's Tangible Assets is 15% per year. A reasonable number here should be based on industry averages for return on assets adjusted to current economic conditions.

So $135,000 of Mr. Owner's profits are derived from the tangible assets of the business ($900,000 x 15%= $135,000) The remaining $225,000 ($360,000 - $135,000 = $225,000) in earnings are the excess earnings.

This $225,000 excess earning number is typically multiplied by a factor of 2 to 5 based on such factors as the level of risk involved in the business, the attractiveness of the business and the industry, competitiveness, and growth potential. The higher the factor used, the higher the estimate of the business will be. A typical multiplier number is 3 for a solid, but not spectacular small business that is judged to be average in terms of the level of risk involved, the attractiveness of the business, the industry, competitiveness, and growth potential. The actual factor used is a mix of opinion, comparison to others in the industry, and industry outlook.

Let's suppose that Mr. Owner's business is a bit better than average in these factors and assign a multiplier of 3.6. Therefore, the value of this business can be determined as follows:

A. Fair market value of tangible equipment

$900,000

B. Total Earnings

$360,000

C. Earnings attributed to Tangible Assets
($900,000 x 15%=$135,000)

-$135,000


D. Excess Earnings
($360,000 - $135,000=$225,000)

$225,000

E. Value of excess earnings
($225,000 x 3.6=$810,000)

$810,000


F. Estimated Total Value (A+E)

$1,710,000

The capitalization methods work best for medium size businesses that have substantial assets such as recievables, inventory, and/or fixed assets.

 

3. Cash Flow Method

 

Buyers often look at a business and evaluate it by determining how much of a loan the cash flow will support. That is, they will look at the profits and add back to profits any expense for depreciation and amortization but also subtract from cash flow an estimated annual amount for equipment replacement. They will also adjust owner's salary to a fair salary or at least an acceptable salary for the new owner.

The adjusted cash flow number is used as a benchmark to measure the firm's ability to service debt. If the adjusted cash flow is, for example, $300,000, and prevailing interest rates for business loans are 8%, and the buyer wants to amortize the loan over 5 years, the maximum this buyer would be willing to pay for the firm would be about $1.2mm. This is the amount that $300,000 per year would support over 5 years.

Therefore, when using this method, the value of a company changes with interest rate conditions. It also changes with the terms a buyer can obtain on a business loan. From a buyer's perspective this may make sense, but from a seller's perspective it introduces a sort of arbitrariness into the process.

 

4.

Tangible Assets

 

(Balance Sheet) Method

 

 

In some instances, a business is worth no more than the value of its tangible assets. This would be the case for some (not all) businesses that are losing money or paying the owner(s) less in total than a fair market compensation. Selling such a business is often a matter of getting the best possible price for the equipment, inventory, and other assets of the business. It is generally best to approach other firms in the same business that would have direct use for such assets. Also, a company in the same business might be interested in taking over your facility. This would mean your leasehold improvements (modifications to space, etc.) would have value and the equipment would have value as "in place" plant and equipment. In place value is higher than the value on a piece by piece basis such as at a sale by auction.

 

5.

Cost To Create Approach

 

(Leap Frog Start-Up)

 

 

Sometimes companies or individuals will purchase a company just to avoid the difficulties of starting from scratch. The buyer will calculate his or her start up needs in terms of dollars and time. Next he or she will look at your business and analyze what it has and what it may be missing relative to the buyer's start up plan. The buyer will calculate value based on his or her projected costs to organize personnel, obtain leases, obtain fixed assets, and cost to develop intangibles such as licenses, copyrights, contracts, etc.).

A reasonable premium of above the sum of projected start up costs may be offered because of the effort and time being saved by the buyer. The more difficult, expensive, and/or time consuming startup is likely to be, the higher the value would be based upon this method.

 

6. Rule of Thumb Methods

 

One of the most common approaches to small business valuation is the use of industry rules of thumb. While most financial analysts cringe at the use of these approaches, they do have their place, which we believe to be as adjuncts to other methods.

One industry rule of thumb says a payroll service customer is worth 1.5 to 2 times its annual service fees. Another says that small weekly newspapers are worth 100% of one year's gross income.

The problem with these and all rule of thumb formulas is that they are statistically derived from the sale of many businesses of each type. That is, an organization might compile statistics on perhaps 100 small weekly newspapers that were sold over a two year period. They will then average all the selling prices and calculate that the average paper sold for 100% of one year's gross income. The rule of thumb is thus created. However, some newspapers may have sold for twice one year's gross while other may have sold for half of one year's gross.

The rule of thumb averages may be accurate for those businesses whose performances are right about at the average. The business with expenses and profits that are right on target with industry averages may well sell for a price in line with the rule of thumb formula. Others will vary. To apply the rule of thumb to a business that varies significantly from the average is not appropriate.

 

7. EBITDA Method

 

Some buyers value a company by simply multiplying the Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA ) by a factor, typically in the 3 to 6 range. This straightforward approach tends to be used for companies with sales over $5,000,000 that have a management infrastructure in place

The advantages are:

  1. It avoids the issue of depreciation and amortization, since most companies use a depreciation and amortization schedule that is intended to take best advantage of the prevailing tax laws. It avoids the issue of taxes, which usually vary according to the ownership structure
  2. It is uncomplicated, and most useful for companies that are well established and earnings are consistent and predictable going forward
  3. It lends itself to comparisons with similar sales
  4. It is most suitable for companies larger then 5MM in revenue, especially companies where variations in tangible assets do not significantly effect the value of the company

The disadvantages are:

  1. It makes no distinction between companies that have a large working capital requirements (current assets, less current liabilities), versus small working capital requirements
  2. It makes no distinction between companies that have large fixed asset needs, vs small fixed assets
  3. It makes no provision for companies that have very substantial real depreciation (e.g. trucking companies, where the trucks rapidly decrease in value) as opposed to companies where actual decrease in asset value is less than the IRS depreciation allowance. In some cases EBIT is used instead of EBITDA when there are large, recurring depreciation expenses.

Even when the EBITDA method is appropriate for valuation, certain adjustments and allowances need to be made before the simple formula can be applied. And of course, the actual multiplier used (whether 3 or 4 or 5 or some other number) is likely to be vigorously negotiated between buyer and seller.

If you would like to know if the EBITDA method may be appropriate for your company, please contact us.

 

8. Valuation based on Synergies

 

In some instances , a buyer will pay a somewhat higher price than any of the above methods would justify.

This could be the case when a buyer sees clear and immediate synergies; if the buyer can make 2 + 2= 5. A strategic buyer may pay a premium if for example, he can gain immediate and sizable economies of scale, gain a new distribution channel for his existing products, or a new product that can take immediate advantage of his existing distribution channels. A buyer may consider this method of valuation when a very high proportion of the seller's gross revenue will, after the acquisition, fall to the buyer's bottom line.

A few examples where we have been able to sell companies based on synergies include:

Example 1:

We have sold several payroll service companies. Payroll service companies (such as Paychex or ADP) often acquire smaller companies in their industry. When they do so, they are more concerned with top line income than bottom line profit. More accurately, they are concerned with what the bottom line income would be if they were to transfer the selling company's customer base to their own system where they have excess capacity. They can add incremental payrolls without a corresponding increase in expenses. A payroll service company that has gross receipt of say, $500,000 and is breaking even, could represent a profit of several hundred thousand dollars to an acquirer already in the business that can process more efficiently and can eliminate much of the smaller firms overhead.

To the buying payroll service company, a more important calculation than the selling company's earnings is a comparison between the cost of gaining customers through acquisition vs. the cost of gaining equivalent customers by traditional methods like hiring salesmen, advertising, etc. Because payroll service firms can accurately estimate their processing expenses based on gross revenues, these companies tend to sell for a multiple of their annual gross sales with only minor regard for their profit or loss.

Example 2:

Some time ago, an outdoor furniture company approached us looking to acquire a complimentary company. They had great distribution of their porch and patio furniture and specifically wanted to acquire a company that made or imported a product that could be sold through the channels they had built. We were able to find an importer of wicker planters that matched its distribution channel perfectly. They agreed to pay a premium based on the synergies they knew they could achieve.

Example 3:

A few years ago we represented a mail order seller of knitting supplies for sale. We found a buyer, a large mail order company of quilting supplies, and showed them how they would gain economies of scale, synergies, and customers that could be cross-sold (knitting customers would buy quilting supplies and vice-versa). They buyer paid a premium justified by the excellent synergies.

Warning

There are companies that overplay this synergy concept by claiming to be in touch with buyers who will pay far more for your business than any valuation method would justify. They may be foreign buyers who are anxious to get a foothold in the US or other synergistic buyers who will pay for hidden assets. Their arguments are quite seductive; who doesn't want to sell their business for twice its value?

However, the rest of the sales pitch is that you need to pay them a large amount of money upfront, as much as $50,000, or the names of these overly generous buyers won't be revealed. They make their money primarily based on the upfront fees. After you pay the upfront fee, you'll get a very nice write-up of your company with fancy charts and printed on the finest cloth weave paper, but you won't get a buyer to overpay for your company.

When buyers buy based on synergies, they typically pay a reasonable premium over the financial methods described previously, or based on some logical method that reflects the buying companies likely earnings (such as with payroll service companies, above). For example, instead of using a multiple of 3.5 times EBITDA, they may use 5.5 times EBITDA. Now the difference between a multiple of 3.5 vs. 5.5 is significant to be sure, but it is not the double or triple valuation that you were promised, before you paid the hefty upfront fee.

We (and other honest intermediaries) make our money based on performance, not on upfront retainers. We have no incentive to make unsubstantiable claims of buyers willing to throw logic to the wind and pay huge sums for your business. We only get paid for making the deal, not for talking about it.